About Me

Name: Pastor Ray
Location: Merrillville, IN
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

History Reveals Direction for Black Leadership of Today

For most of my lifetime, black leaders promoted a philosophy that relies heavily on two important credos. The first, racism as the source of what ails black folk, has catapulted certain leaders like Minister Louis Farrakhan, Reverend Jesse Jackson and Reverend Al Sharpton to the national stage. The second credo, that the guilt of those directly or indirectly responsible is a profitable enterprise, has subverted the true intent of the Civil Rights Movement in America.


In his recent publication, “White Guilt: How Blacks and Whites Together Destroyed the Promise of the Civil Rights Movement”, author Shelby Steele asserts that a combination of white guilt over racism and black opportunistic leadership came together to dramatically alter the original intent of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950’s and 60’s. It is worth mentioning that my study has led me to conclude that the Civil Rights Movement was not a struggle against racism as much as it was an effort to gain human recognition. Who can forget the signs held by the striking sanitation workers in Memphis 1968, just days before the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.? Those signs said, “I Am a Man”, not a black man, but a man.


Today’s black leadership has drifted far from that proclamation by asserting blackness over humanity. While I am proud of my ethnicity, it does not deserve to be elevated over any other, even in light of past atrocities. The elevation of my humanity before my ethnicity removes the power of the racist in my life. I will not accept poor treatment because as a human, I require better.


It seems that past black leaders like Booker T. Washington understood this concept all too well. Washington, an ex-slave who rose to national prominence in the late nineteenth century, once remarked concerning the future of black people in America, “No greater injury can be done to any youth than to let him feel that because he belongs to this or that race he will be advanced in life regardless of his own merits or efforts.” This statement reveals Washington’s deep belief that the advancement of every human being should be by his or her own determination and effort.


Today’s black leadership seems content to mire the consciousness of America in the victim-guilt pathology. Leaders like Rev. Jackson and Rev. Sharpton make handsome livings by stoking the fire of racial intolerance, identifying the victims and sending a bill to the guilty. This policy of neglecting the glaring social problems that find their genesis within the black community must cease to be the rally cry of black uplift. We must shun leaders who wish to keep us in a state of perpetual victimhood, while they goad the assigned guilty into lining their pockets or assisting in the redistribution of wealth in America.


This doctrine of victimhood even infects those blacks who have worked hard and earned some degree of success in America by enticing them with the carrot of “you would be better off if not for racism”. Recently, I met a person of like ethnicity who appeared to be hardworking and gainfully employed. He remarked to me “the black man’s biggest problem is racism in America today”. When I challenged this assertion by saying that I thought the failure to take advantage of opportunity was a much greater malady, he proceeded to demand that he get what was his by right.


This thinking underscores the fundamental need for new direction in black leadership. Our history teaches that we can gain uplift without creating victims.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Black Uplift Discovered in Rich History

During the Democratic National Convention, set on the 45th anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech, my focus drifted to the rich history of black people in America. Black delegates were, as I was, extremely proud of this historical moment. Yet I began to wonder about the philosophical similarities or differences between black leaders like Senator Obama, Reverend Al Sharpton, Reverend Jesse Jackson, and Frederick Douglass, Booker T. Washington and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Each has stood for what they believed to be the authentically black position of their day. The question I will address in this three-part series, is whether the past leaders would agree with positions espoused by current black leadership. To examine this, one must juxtapose the historical record of quotes and books by past leaders against current ideas emanating from black leaders of today.

Frederick Douglass, a former slave, embodied early black leadership in America. Escaping in 1838, Douglass rose to prominence as an abolitionist in the 1850’s and continued until his death in 1895. In his 1865 speech before the Annual Anti-Slavery Society, Douglass describes his philosophy concerning the uplift of blacks in America when he states, “Everybody has asked the question. . ."What shall we do with the Negro?" I have had but one answer from the beginning. Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us! If the apples will not remain on the tree of their own strength, if they are worm-eaten at the core, if they are early ripe and disposed to fall, let them fall! I am not for tying or fastening them on the tree in any way, except by nature's plan, and if they will not stay there, let them fall. And if the Negro cannot stand on his own legs, let him fall also. All I ask is, give him a chance to stand on his own legs! Let him alone! “

Douglass seems committed to black uplift as the result of individual responsibility, occurring in an atmosphere of unencumbered opportunity. This is fascinating when considering that Douglass lived in an America that provided miniscule opportunity for blacks to succeed. Opposing this position seems to be the mantra of current black leadership.

Senator Obama said while in Gary, IN, “I think it's time we had a president who doesn't deny our problems or blame the American people for them but takes responsibility and provides the leadership to solve them”.

This position by Senator Obama commits the resources of the Presidency to solving the problems of Americans. Should this be the task of the President of the United States? If so, then perhaps we should include this responsibility in the presidential oath of office. We could remove the part about upholding the Constitution and defending us from all enemies, both foreign and domestic; replacing those words with the promise to pay all my debt, educate my children and myself, abort children on demand, allow people to enter America illegally, and pay for it all by raising taxes on the most successful of us.

Americans would never stand for this, yet it is interesting to see ideas of success compared with one another. Douglass’ position not only works for black Americans, but for all Americans.

The Constitution does not guarantee equal success, but does guarantee equal protection and equal opportunity. To expect that we should all succeed applying various levels of personal industry is like saying every horse should win just because he is in the race.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pastor's Comments Reflect Deep Hurt

Recently there has been much consternation concerning the sermonic remarks of Senator Barack Obama’s Pastor, Dr. Jeremiah Wright of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago.  I do not pretend to speak for Dr. Wright, but as a minister and a pastor, I do share a similar responsibility in ministering weekly to a comparable demographic of parishioner as Dr. Wright. 

In the context of the predominantly black church preaching experience, one is tempted almost weekly to succumb to a desire to pacify one’s parishioners with messages designed to validate the belief that someone else is responsible for their condition.  That someone is often Satan or the Devil, the President, the Government as an entity or perhaps even White Folks in general.  This is due primarily to the victim psyche that is pervasive in the black community.  Years of racism perceived or real have left a deep scar of hurt and distrust of those outside and some inside the black community.  As real as this hurt is to the individual, I believe it has been equally or even more self destructive.

This is the context in which the black Pastor must minister.  He or she is challenged to “lift the spirits” of those who arrive each Sunday, many licking wounds that are real, whether self-inflicted or not.  I am convinced that Dr. Wright’s apparent dissatisfaction with America in his commentary suggest that he has validated the role of victim and determined that any black success must be achieved in a separate arena, without any credit going to an overtly oppressive and racist society. 

 While I understand Dr. Wright’s comments, I must disagree not only with what he said, but with the suggested sentiment behind his words.  It is true that America has been slothful in responding to the evil of racism and the corresponding racist attitudes derived from within a culture of segregation and oppression, but we no longer live in a society where we, as black people, can afford to explain away our ills under the broad brush of racism and racist conspiracy.  For example, we cannot continue to blame a racist culture for the disproportionate number of black men in prison and ignore the argument of proportion in reference to the number of black children who have children and/or abortions in their teens or the number of children in our community without a father.  The facts speak for themselves.

It is clear that Dr. Wright has distinguished himself personally and the congregation that he leads by providing vital ministry that gives opportunities for uplift to the thousands who attend and who live nearby.  He has more education than many will ever earn.  Yet we cannot not ignore the fact that his controversial comments may be born out of a generational pathology of victimhood.  No doubt that Dr. Wright and many of his generation could relate many more horrible tales of indignities suffered because of their black skin than I could even imagine, let alone experience.  No one can argue the absence of injury, but we can say that it is time for us to heal.  We must heal the injury by not reopening the wound at every opportunity, but by generating the hope of our ancestors and their belief in a country where character is more important than skin color.  In speaking to a hurting people each week it is my duty to speak of hope for opportunity and improvement in their lives; while refraining from passing on my personal pain or even validating their self imposed victim status.  This is because if one chooses to live as a victim, he or she will operate as a victim with a ready made excuse for failure.  My duty is to minister to the hurting masses as one that provides hope for success and not reasons for failure.

America has much to learn in reference to race and may or may not be moving quickly enough in her lesson.  But one thing we as black people can do is stop giving relevance and legitimacy to racist attitudes by allowing them to be our song of defeat.  Racism is irrelevant in the face of the confident and self assured person who recognizes their opportunity was purchased at a high price.  We would do well to concentrate our efforts on building this kind of personal drive within our young people that says we can and we will succeed INSPITE of the obstacles that lay before us.  No more will we validate defeatist attitudes in our young or in our leaders.  The target of black uplift must be placed firmly and squarely within our own community.  We have much work to do.  We will lessen the prison population the moment we decide as a people that we will no longer tolerate nor support the illegal drug trade even if it means turning in our own family.  That is a hard pill to swallow, but one of many necessary to bring the required healing and recovery.

Dr. Wright may publicly blame America for her failure, it is his right.  Yet the freedom of this America insures that he, as well as others can stand in the pulpit or in the pasture and express themselves.  This freedom must be defended in a difficult world.  America is not perfect and has fault both at home and on the world stage, but fault alone cannot be reason to disavow this country.  I have been disappointed in America, but she is mine.  She belongs to me as much as she belongs to anybody.  I choose not to be one of her victims, but one of her healers.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »